Disclaimer & Confirmation of User
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges and confirms that:
- there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind from Anshul Dutt & Co. or its members to solicit any work through this website;
- the user wishes to gain information about the firm for his or her own information and use;
- the information is made available only at the user’s request and is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as advertising or solicitation;
- no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, and the firm is not liable for any action taken in reliance on it;
- nothing on this website creates a lawyer–client relationship.
Dispute Resolution
Challenging an Arbitral Award Under Section 34: Grounds and Limits
Courts rarely reopen an award on merits. Here is what Section 34 does and does not allow.

This article is general information only, not legal advice, and not solicitation of work. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for advice on your specific facts.
Section 34 Is Not an Appeal
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Indian arbitration law is that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not allow a court to review whether the arbitrator got the facts or the law right. Courts examine the award only on specific, narrow grounds, they do not reassess evidence or substitute their own view for the tribunal’s.
The Grounds That Are Available
A party can seek to set aside an award if it can show incapacity of a party or an invalid arbitration agreement, a failure to give proper notice of the arbitral proceedings or an inability to present its case, that the award deals with a dispute not contemplated by the arbitration agreement, that the composition of the tribunal or the procedure was not in accordance with the parties’ agreement, or that the award conflicts with the public policy of India, which includes being vitiated by fraud, corruption, or a fundamental breach of natural justice.
The Limitation Period
An application under Section 34 must be filed within three months of receiving the award, with a further extension of up to thirty days available if the court is satisfied there was sufficient cause for the delay. Beyond that, the award becomes final and enforceable, which makes early legal advice on whether genuine grounds exist important rather than optional.
What Happens if the Challenge Succeeds
If a court sets aside an award, the matter does not automatically get retried by the same tribunal. Depending on the ground on which the award was set aside, parties may need to commence arbitration afresh, which is one of the reasons courts are deliberately cautious about interfering with awards except in genuinely deserving cases.
This note is prepared by our Dispute Resolution team. If you are dealing with a related situation, get in touch with us.
← Back to all Insights