Disclaimer & Confirmation of User
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges and confirms that:
- there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind from Anshul Dutt & Co. or its members to solicit any work through this website;
- the user wishes to gain information about the firm for his or her own information and use;
- the information is made available only at the user’s request and is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as advertising or solicitation;
- no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, and the firm is not liable for any action taken in reliance on it;
- nothing on this website creates a lawyer–client relationship.
Corporate & Startups
Force Majeure Clauses: Drafting Them So They Actually Work
Generic boilerplate rarely holds up. Here is what makes a force majeure clause enforceable.

This article is general information only, not legal advice, and not solicitation of work. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for advice on your specific facts.
Why Generic Force Majeure Clauses Fail
Many contracts still carry a boilerplate force majeure clause copied from a template, listing events like war, flood, and government action without connecting them to how performance under that specific contract could actually be affected. When a real disruption occurs, vague clauses generate disputes about whether they even apply, exactly when courts and tribunals have found against parties trying to invoke them.
What a Court Actually Looks For
Indian courts, and arbitral tribunals applying Indian law, generally require that the event was unforeseeable, beyond the party’s reasonable control, and that it actually, not just inconveniently, prevented performance. A party that could have performed at higher cost, or through an alternative method, is usually not excused merely because performance became less commercially attractive.
Drafting Clauses That Hold Up
An enforceable clause defines qualifying events with reasonable specificity relevant to the contract’s subject matter, sets out a notice obligation requiring the affected party to inform the other side promptly, states the consequence, suspension, extension of time, or termination if the event continues beyond a defined period, and addresses whether payment obligations already accrued are excused or merely deferred.
The Alternative: Material Adverse Change and Hardship Clauses
Where the concern is less an inability to perform and more a fundamental change in economic circumstances, a hardship or material adverse change clause, allowing renegotiation rather than outright excuse, is often a better fit than stretching force majeure to cover a situation it was never designed for.
This note is prepared by our Corporate & Startups team. If you are dealing with a related situation, get in touch with us.
← Back to all Insights