Disclaimer & Confirmation of User
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, advocates and law firms are not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, the user acknowledges and confirms that:
- there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind from Anshul Dutt & Co. or its members to solicit any work through this website;
- the user wishes to gain information about the firm for his or her own information and use;
- the information is made available only at the user’s request and is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as advertising or solicitation;
- no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, and the firm is not liable for any action taken in reliance on it;
- nothing on this website creates a lawyer–client relationship.
Family & Succession
Women’s Rights in Ancestral Property: What the Law Says Today
How the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act changed daughters’ rights as coparceners.

This article is general information only, not legal advice, and not solicitation of work. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for advice on your specific facts.
The 2005 Amendment and Why It Mattered
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 changed Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act to make daughters coparceners in a Hindu Undivided Family by birth, on the same footing as sons. This gave daughters an equal right, not merely a right to maintenance, in ancestral joint family property, a right that exists from birth and does not depend on whether the father is alive when the amendment took effect.
Ancestral Versus Self-Acquired Property
This coparcenary right applies specifically to ancestral property, meaning property inherited up to four generations of male lineage without division. Self-acquired property, property a person buys or earns on their own, is not subject to the same automatic coparcenary rights and instead passes according to a valid will, or in its absence, the ordinary rules of intestate succession, where daughters and sons already share equally under the Hindu Succession Act.
Retrospective Effect and Settled Partitions
The Supreme Court has clarified that a daughter’s coparcenary right applies regardless of whether her father was alive on the date the 2005 amendment came into force, so long as the daughter herself was born before or after that date. However, partitions or alienations of property that were validly completed before December 20, 2004, through a registered deed or a court decree, generally remain undisturbed.
Practical Steps for Women Asserting These Rights
Where ancestral property has been divided without a daughter’s consent or share, the available remedy is typically a suit for partition, which requires establishing the family’s property history and lineage. Gathering revenue records, prior partition deeds, and succession documents early makes this considerably more manageable.
This note is prepared by our Family & Succession team. If you are dealing with a related situation, get in touch with us.
← Back to all Insights